Fundamentals of Parameterized Complexity Revisited
Maurice Chandoo

TL;DR
This paper revisits the foundations of parameterized complexity, removing the polynomial-time restriction on parameter functions and generalizing the framework to include promise problems, enabling broader applications.
Contribution
It introduces a new formalization of parameterized complexity using promise problems, extending the theory beyond polynomial-time computable parameters.
Findings
Allows interpretation of complexity concepts on restricted input sets
Enables application to enumeration and approximation problems
Provides a unified framework for parameterized complexity
Abstract
Flum and Grohe define a parameter (parameterization) as a function which maps words over a given alphabet to natural numbers. They require such functions to be polynomial-time computable. We show how this technical restriction can be lifted without breaking the theory. More specifically, instead of we consider the set of languages that it bounds as parameterization and define the basic notions of parameterized complexity in terms of promise problems, which completely replace slices. One advantage of this formalization is that it becomes possible to interpret any complexity-theoretic concept which can be considered on a restricted set of inputs as a parameterized concept. Moreover, this formalization provides a unified way to apply the parameterization paradigm to other kinds of complexity such as enumeration or approximation by simply defining promise problems.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
Topicssemigroups and automata theory · Advanced Graph Theory Research · Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
