Explaining Constraint Interaction: How to Interpret Estimated Model Parameters under Alternative Scaling Methods
Stefan Kl\"o{\ss}ner, Eric Klopp

TL;DR
This paper investigates how different scaling methods affect the interpretation of estimated model parameters, explaining the phenomenon of constraint interaction and providing guidelines for correct interpretation.
Contribution
It introduces a detailed explanation of constraint interaction caused by scaling methods and offers rules for interpreting parameters under various scaling approaches.
Findings
Scaling methods influence which parameters are estimated.
Constraint interaction depends on the choice of scaling.
Guidelines for correct interpretation of parameters are proposed.
Abstract
In this paper, we explain the reasons behind constraint interaction, which is the phenomenon that the results of testing equality constraints may depend heavily on the scaling method used. We find that the scaling methods interfere with the testing procedures because scaling methods determine which transformations of population quantities model parameters actually estimate. We therefore also develop rules on how to correctly interpret estimates of model parameters under alternative scaling methods.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
