Numerical Simulations to Evaluate and Compare the Performances of Existing and Novel Degrader Materials for Proton Therapy
Robin Tesse, Alain Dubus, Nicolas Pauly, C\'edric Hernalsteens, Willem, Kleeven, Frederic Stichelbaut

TL;DR
This study uses detailed GEANT4 simulations to evaluate and compare the performance of existing and novel degrader materials for proton therapy, focusing on beam emittance and transmission to optimize design and cost.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive comparison of traditional and new degrader materials using simulations and semi-analytical models, highlighting potential improvements with novel materials.
Findings
Novel materials show potential for reduced beam emittance
Simulations identify differences in transmission efficiency
Comparison with semi-analytical models validates results
Abstract
The performance of the energy degrader in terms of beam properties directly impacts the design and cost of cyclotron-based proton therapy centers. The aim of this study is to evaluate the performances of different existing and novel degrader materials. The quantitative estimate is based on detailed GEANT4 simulations that analyze the beam-matter interaction and provide a determination of the beam emittance increase and transmission. Comparisons between existing (aluminum, graphite, beryllium) and novel (boron carbide and diamond) degrader materials are provided and evaluated against semi-analytical models of multiple Coulomb scattering. The results showing a potential in emittance reduction for novel materials are presented and discussed in detail.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
