Survey geometry and the internal consistency of recent cosmic shear measurements
M. A. Troxel, E. Krause, C. Chang, T. F. Eifler, O. Friedrich, D., Gruen, N. MacCrann, A. Chen, C. Davis, J. DeRose, S. Dodelson, M. Gatti, B., Hoyle, D. Huterer, M. Jarvis, F. Lacasa, H. V. Peiris, J. Prat, S. Samuroff,, C. S\'anchez, E. Sheldon, P. Vielzeuf, M. Wang, J. Zuntz

TL;DR
This paper refines the covariance matrix for cosmic shear measurements by accurately accounting for survey boundary effects, significantly reducing model tension and improving agreement with other cosmological data.
Contribution
It provides an exact expression for shape noise in cosmic shear covariance, addressing boundary effects and updating shear calibration treatment.
Findings
Shape noise increased by over a factor of three on large scales.
Reduced chi-squared from 161 to 121, resolving model tension.
Improved consistency of KiDS-450 results with DES Year 1 and Planck.
Abstract
We explore the impact of an update to the typical approximation for the shape noise term in the analytic covariance matrix for cosmic shear experiments that assumes the absence of survey boundary and mask effects. We present an exact expression for the number of galaxy pairs in this term based on the the survey mask, which leads to more than a factor of three increase in the shape noise on the largest measured scales for the Kilo-Degree Survey (KIDS-450) real-space cosmic shear data. We compare the result of this analytic expression to several alternative methods for measuring the shape noise from the data and find excellent agreement. This update to the covariance resolves any internal model tension evidenced by the previously large cosmological best-fit for the KiDS-450 cosmic shear data. The best-fit is reduced from 161 to 121 for 118 degrees of freedom. We also…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
