
TL;DR
This paper discusses the Bekenstein entropy bound, highlighting counterexamples under various definitions and presenting a proof for a specific formulation proposed by Casini that resolves previous issues.
Contribution
It clarifies the conditions under which the Bekenstein bound holds and presents a proof for Casini's formulation that avoids earlier counterexamples.
Findings
Counterexamples exist for many definitions of the bound.
Casini's formulation allows a rigorous proof of the bound.
The proof applies to a specific, consistent set of definitions.
Abstract
Bekenstein's conjectured entropy bound for a system of linear size and energy , namely , has counterexamples for many of the ways in which the "system," , , and may be defined. One consistent set of definitions for these quantities in flat Minkowski spacetime is that is the total von Neumann entropy and is the expectation value of the energy in a "vacuum-outside-" quantum state that has the the vacuum expectation values for all operators entirely outside a sphere of radius . However, there are counterexamples to the Bekenstein bound for this set of definitions. Nevertheless, an alternative formulation ten years ago by Horacio Casini for the definitions of and of have finally enabled a proof for this particular formulation of the Bekenstein bound.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
