A Technique for Estimating the Absolute Gain of a Photomultiplier Tube
M. Takahashi, Y. Inome, S. Yoshii, A. Bamba, S. Gunji, D. Hadasch, M., Hayashida, H. Katagiri, Y. Konno, H. Kubo, J. Kushida, D. Nakajima, T., Nakamori, T. Nagayoshi, K. Nishijima, S. Nozaki, D. Mazin, S. Mashuda, R., Mirzoyan, H. Ohoka, R. Orito, T. Saito, S. Sakurai, J. Takeda

TL;DR
This paper presents a new method to accurately estimate the absolute gain of a photomultiplier tube by analyzing the Poisson-distributed photoelectron signals without complex distribution analysis.
Contribution
The study introduces a procedure to precisely measure single photoelectron signals and the amplification factor without relying on assumptions about signal distribution.
Findings
Effective estimation of single photoelectron signals
Accurate calculation of photomultiplier tube gain
Method demonstrated with experimental data
Abstract
Detection of low-intensity light relies on the conversion of photons to photoelectrons, which are then multiplied and detected as an electrical signal. To measure the actual intensity of the light, one must know the factor by which the photoelectrons have been multiplied. To obtain this amplification factor, we have developed a procedure for estimating precisely the signal caused by a single photoelectron. The method utilizes the fact that the photoelectrons conform to a Poisson distribution. The average signal produced by a single photoelectron can then be estimated from the number of noise events, without requiring analysis of the distribution of the signal produced by a single photoelectron. The signal produced by one or more photoelectrons can be estimated experimentally without any assumptions. This technique, and an example of the analysis of a signal from a photomultiplier tube,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
