Why are classical bulges more common in S0 galaxies than in spiral galaxies?
Preetish K. Mishra, Yogesh Wadadekar, Sudhanshu Barway

TL;DR
This study investigates why classical bulges are more prevalent in S0 galaxies than in spirals, finding that internal quenching processes likely transform classical bulge spirals into S0s.
Contribution
It provides a comparative analysis of bulge types in S0 and spiral galaxies, highlighting the role of internal quenching in morphological transformation.
Findings
Higher fraction of classical bulges in S0s at fixed stellar mass.
Classical bulge spirals are more likely to be quenched and become S0s.
Pseudobulge spirals are mostly star-forming.
Abstract
In this paper, we try to understand why the classical bulge fraction observed in S0 galaxies is significantly higher than that in spiral galaxies. We carry out a comparative study of the bulge and global properties of a sample of spiral and S0 galaxies in a fixed environment. Our sample is flux limited and contains 262 spiral and 155 S0 galaxies drawn from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. We have classified bulges into classical and pseudobulge categories based on their position on the Kormendy diagram. Dividing our sample into bins of galaxy stellar mass, we find that the fraction of S0 galaxies hosting a classical bulge is significantly higher than the classical bulge fraction seen in spirals even at fixed stellar mass. We have compared the bulge and the global properties of spirals and S0 galaxies in our sample and find indications that spiral galaxies which host a classical bulge,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
