
TL;DR
This paper presents evidence from supernovae and gamma-ray bursts suggesting the universe may be static, challenging the standard expanding universe model and proposing Curvature Cosmology as an alternative.
Contribution
It provides observational evidence against time dilation in distant objects and critiques standard calibration methods, supporting a static universe hypothesis.
Findings
Supernova light curves show no significant time dilation.
Standard calibration methods are flawed, explaining previous null results.
Gamma-ray burst durations are consistent with no time dilation.
Abstract
A fundamental property of an expanding universe is that any time dependent characteristic of distant objects must appear to scale by the factor ). This is called time dilation. Light curves of type Ia supernovae and the duration of Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRB) are the only observations that can directly measure time dilation over a wide range of redshifts. An analysis of raw observations of 2,333 type Ia supernovae light-curves shows that their widths, relative to a standard template, have a power-law exponent as a function of , of (0.083 +/- 0.024) which is consistent with no time dilation and inconsistent with standard time dilation. In addition, it is shown that the standard method for calibrating the type Ia supernovae light curves (SALT2) is flawed, which explains why this lack of time dilation has not been previously observed. \par Nearby observations show that the peak…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
