Optimal and Maximin Procedures for Multiple Testing Problems
Saharon Rosset, Ruth Heller, Amichai Painsky, Ehud Aharoni

TL;DR
This paper develops a unified optimization framework for multiple testing procedures, deriving optimal and maximin rules that improve power while controlling error rates, applicable to various hypotheses and real-world data.
Contribution
It formulates multiple testing as an infinite-dimensional optimization problem, providing explicit optimal tests and practical maximin rules for FWER and FDR control.
Findings
Significant power improvements over existing methods.
Explicit optimal tests for normal means.
Enhanced subgroup analysis in systematic reviews.
Abstract
Multiple testing problems are a staple of modern statistical analysis. The fundamental objective of multiple testing procedures is to reject as many false null hypotheses as possible (that is, maximize some notion of power), subject to controlling an overall measure of false discovery, like family-wise error rate (FWER) or false discovery rate (FDR). In this paper we formulate multiple testing of simple hypotheses as an infinite-dimensional optimization problem, seeking the most powerful rejection policy which guarantees strong control of the selected measure. In that sense, our approach is a generalization of the optimal Neyman-Pearson test for a single hypothesis. We show that for exchangeable hypotheses, for both FWER and FDR and relevant notions of power, these problems can be formulated as infinite linear programs and can in principle be solved for any number of hypotheses. We also…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStatistical Methods in Clinical Trials · Advanced Causal Inference Techniques · Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
