New forms of quantum value indefiniteness suggest that incompatible views on contexts are epistemic
Karl Svozil

TL;DR
This paper explores how new forms of quantum value indefiniteness, derived from extensions of the Kochen-Specker theorem, imply that differing views on quantum contexts are epistemic in nature.
Contribution
It introduces novel forms of quantum value indefiniteness based on extended Kochen-Specker theorems, highlighting the epistemic interpretation of quantum states across multiple contexts.
Findings
Quantum logics suggest true-implies-value indefiniteness
Different contextual views are epistemic
Extensions of Kochen-Specker support these interpretations
Abstract
Extensions of the Kochen-Specker theorem use quantum logics whose classical interpretation suggests a true-implies-value indefiniteness property. This can be interpreted as an indication that any view of a quantum state beyond a single context is epistemic.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
