A comparative study of feature selection methods for stress hotspot classification in materials
Ankita Mangal, Elizabeth A. Holm

TL;DR
This paper evaluates various feature selection methods for stress hotspot classification in materials, aiming to improve model accuracy and interpretability by identifying key microstructural features influencing stress buildup.
Contribution
It compares feature selection techniques in the context of stress hotspot classification, highlighting biases and recommending preferred methods for physical interpretation.
Findings
Certain feature selection methods are biased in this context.
A preferred technique for feature ranking enhances physical interpretability.
Insights into microstructural features influencing stress hotspots.
Abstract
The first step in constructing a machine learning model is defining the features of the data set that can be used for optimal learning. In this work we discuss feature selection methods, which can be used to build better models, as well as achieve model interpretability. We applied these methods in the context of stress hotspot classification problem, to determine what microstructural characteristics can cause stress to build up in certain grains during uniaxial tensile deformation. The results show how some feature selection techniques are biased and demonstrate a preferred technique to get feature rankings for physical interpretations.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
