An initial exploration of vicarious and in-scene calibration techniques for small unmanned aircraft systems

TL;DR

This study compares traditional and novel calibration techniques for small unmanned aircraft systems in precision agriculture, showing that the new AARR method with onboard sensors could match or outperform existing methods in accuracy.

Contribution

The paper introduces the AARR calibration method using onboard downwelling radiance sensors as a cost-effective alternative to standard calibration panels for sUAS imagery.

Findings

2-Point ELM achieved the lowest mean error of 0.0165.

AARR showed potential with a mean error of 0.0026, outperforming 2-Point ELM.

AARR may serve as a viable calibration alternative without known reflectance standards.

Abstract

The use of small unmanned aircraft systems (sUAS) for applications in the field of precision agriculture has demonstrated the need to produce temporally consistent imagery to allow for quantitative comparisons. In order for these aerial images to be used to identify actual changes on the ground, conversion of raw digital count to reflectance, or to an atmospherically normalized space, needs to be carried out. This paper will describe an experiment that compares the use of reflectance calibration panels, for use with the empirical line method (ELM), against a newly proposed ratio of the target radiance and the downwelling radiance, to predict the reflectance of known targets in the scene. We propose that the use of an on-board downwelling light sensor (DLS) may provide the sUAS remote sensing practitioner with an approach that does not require the expensive and time consuming task of placing known reflectance standards in the scene. Three calibration methods were tested in this study: 2-Point ELM, 1-Point ELM, and At-altitude Radiance Ratio (AARR). Our study indicates that the traditional 2-Point ELM produces the lowest mean error in band effective reflectance factor, 0.0165. The 1-Point ELM and AARR produce mean errors of 0.0343 and 0.0287 respectively. A modeling of the proposed AARR approach indicates that the technique has the potential to perform better than the 2-Point ELM method, with a 0.0026 mean error in band effective reflectance factor, indicating that this newly proposed technique may prove to be a viable alternative with suitable on-board sensors.