Gaia Data Release 2: Properties and validation of the radial velocities
D. Katz, P. Sartoretti, M. Cropper, P. Panuzzo, G.M. Seabroke, Y., Viala, K. Benson, R. Blomme, G. Jasniewicz, A. Jean-Antoine, H. Huckle, M., Smith, S. Baker, F. Crifo, Y. Damerdji, M. David, C. Dolding, Y. Fr\'emat, E., Gosset, A. Guerrier, L.P. Guy, R. Haigron, K. Jan{\ss}en

TL;DR
Gaia DR2 provides median radial velocities for over 7 million stars with high accuracy and precision, validated against ground-based catalogs, covering the entire sky with detailed quality assessments.
Contribution
This paper presents the validation, properties, and quality assessment of Gaia DR2's median radial velocities for millions of stars, including accuracy and precision analysis.
Findings
Median radial velocities for 7.2 million stars published
Overall precision of 1.05 km/s, better than pre-launch expectations
Radial velocity precision varies with magnitude and temperature
Abstract
For Gaia DR2 (GDR2), 280 million spectra, collected by the RVS instrument on-board Gaia, were processed and median radial velocities were derived for 9.8 million sources brighter than Grvs = 12 mag. This paper describes the validation and properties of the median radial velocities published in GDR2. Quality tests and filters are applied to select, from the 9.8 million radial velocities, those with the quality to be published in GDR2. The accuracy of the selected sample is assessed with respect to ground-based catalogues. Its precision is estimated using both ground-based catalogues and the distribution of the Gaia radial velocity uncertainties. GDR2 contains median radial velocities for 7 224 631 stars, with Teff in the range [3550, 6900] K, which passed succesfully the quality tests. The published median radial velocities provide a full sky-coverage and have a completness with respect…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
