Commonsense mining as knowledge base completion? A study on the impact of novelty
Stanis{\l}aw Jastrz\k{e}bski, Dzmitry Bahdanau, Seyedarian Hosseini,, Michael Noukhovitch, Yoshua Bengio, Jackie Chi Kit Cheung

TL;DR
This paper investigates whether knowledge base completion models can effectively mine novel commonsense knowledge from raw text, emphasizing the importance of novelty in predicted triples and analyzing the challenges involved.
Contribution
It introduces the concept of novelty in predicted triples for commonsense knowledge mining and demonstrates that a simple baseline can outperform previous methods in predicting more novel knowledge.
Findings
Simple baseline outperforms previous state-of-the-art in predicting novel triples.
Novelty of triples is a crucial factor in evaluating knowledge base completion.
Mining highly novel commonsense knowledge remains a challenging task.
Abstract
Commonsense knowledge bases such as ConceptNet represent knowledge in the form of relational triples. Inspired by the recent work by Li et al., we analyse if knowledge base completion models can be used to mine commonsense knowledge from raw text. We propose novelty of predicted triples with respect to the training set as an important factor in interpreting results. We critically analyse the difficulty of mining novel commonsense knowledge, and show that a simple baseline method outperforms the previous state of the art on predicting more novel.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
