Deep Learning in Spiking Neural Networks
Amirhossein Tavanaei, Masoud Ghodrati, Saeed Reza Kheradpisheh,, Timothee Masquelier, Anthony S. Maida

TL;DR
This paper reviews recent methods for training deep spiking neural networks, highlighting their biological plausibility, energy efficiency, and the progress made in closing the accuracy gap with traditional artificial neural networks.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive comparison of supervised and unsupervised training methods for deep SNNs, emphasizing recent advancements and remaining challenges.
Findings
SNNs are more biologically realistic and hardware-friendly than ANNs.
The accuracy gap between SNNs and ANNs is decreasing and may vanish on some tasks.
SNNs require fewer operations, making them more energy-efficient.
Abstract
In recent years, deep learning has been a revolution in the field of machine learning, for computer vision in particular. In this approach, a deep (multilayer) artificial neural network (ANN) is trained in a supervised manner using backpropagation. Huge amounts of labeled examples are required, but the resulting classification accuracy is truly impressive, sometimes outperforming humans. Neurons in an ANN are characterized by a single, static, continuous-valued activation. Yet biological neurons use discrete spikes to compute and transmit information, and the spike times, in addition to the spike rates, matter. Spiking neural networks (SNNs) are thus more biologically realistic than ANNs, and arguably the only viable option if one wants to understand how the brain computes. SNNs are also more hardware friendly and energy-efficient than ANNs, and are thus appealing for technology,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
