Theory of tunneling spectroscopy of normal metal/ferromagnet/spin-triplet superconductor junctions
L.A.B. Olde Olthof, S.-I. Suzuki, A.A. Golubov, M. Kunieda, S., Yonezawa, Y. Maeno, and Y. Tanaka

TL;DR
This paper models the tunneling conductance in a normal metal/ferromagnet/spin-triplet superconductor junction to distinguish between chiral and helical p-wave pairing symmetries, aiding in identifying the pairing state of Sr$_{2}$RuO$_{4}$.
Contribution
It introduces a theoretical analysis comparing chiral and helical p-wave pairings in a ferromagnet/superconductor junction using an extended BTK formalism.
Findings
Different voltage dependencies for chiral and helical p-wave pairings.
Identical conductance when the d-vector is perpendicular to magnetization.
Guidance for experimental identification of pairing symmetry.
Abstract
We study the tunneling conductance of a ballistic normal metal / ferromagnet / spin-triplet superconductor junction using the extended Blonder-Tinkham-Klapwijk formalism as a model for a -axis oriented Au / SrRuO / SrRuO junction. We compare chiral -wave (CPW) and helical -wave (HPW) pair potentials, combined with ferromagnet magnetization directions parallel and perpendicular to the interface. For fixed , where is a direction of magnetization in the ferromagnet measured from the -axis, the tunneling conductance of CPW and HPW clearly show different voltage dependencies. It is found that the cases where the -vector is perpendicular to the magnetization direction (CPW with and HPW with ) are identical. The obtained results serve as a guide to determine the pairing symmetry of the spin-triplet…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
