Platonic solids, Archimedean solids and semi-equivelar maps on the sphere
Basudeb Datta, Dipendu Maity

TL;DR
This paper classifies semi-equivelar maps on the sphere, showing they correspond to well-known polyhedral boundaries and establishing their geometric realizability, with a unique exception among semi-equivelar maps.
Contribution
It provides a complete classification of semi-equivelar maps on the sphere, identifying all such maps with known polyhedral boundaries and proving their geometric realizability.
Findings
Exactly one semi-equivelar map on 2^2 is not vertex-transitive.
All semi-equivelar maps on 2^2 are geometrizable and correspond to semi-regular tilings.
Semi-equivelar maps on 2^2 are characterized by an inequality involving their face types.
Abstract
A vertex-transitive map is a map on a surface on which the automorphism group of acts transitively on the set of vertices of . If the face-cycles at all the vertices in a map are of same type then the map is called a semi-equivelar map. Clearly, a vertex-transitive map is semi-equivelar. Converse of this is not true in general. In particular, there are semi-equivelar maps on the torus, on the Klein bottle and on the surfaces of Euler characteristics which are not vertex-transitive. It is known that the boundaries of Platonic solids, Archimedean solids, regular prisms and antiprisms are vertex-transitive maps on . Here we show that there is exactly one semi-equivelar map on which is not vertex-transitive. More precisely, we show that a semi-equivelar map on is the boundary of a Platonic solid, an Archimedean solid, a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
