Partial Regularization of First-Order Resolution Proofs
Jan Gorzny, Ezequiel Postan, Bruno Woltzenlogel Paleo

TL;DR
This paper extends a proof compression technique called partial regularization from propositional to first-order logic, improving the conciseness of automated theorem prover proofs through a generalized algorithm and empirical evaluation.
Contribution
It introduces a generalized partial regularization algorithm for first-order resolution proofs, adapting propositional techniques to first-order logic and evaluating its effectiveness.
Findings
The generalized algorithm effectively compresses first-order resolution proofs.
Combining partial regularization with existing methods yields better proof compression.
Empirical results demonstrate improved proof conciseness in theorem proving.
Abstract
Resolution and superposition are common techniques which have seen widespread use with propositional and first-order logic in modern theorem provers. In these cases, resolution proof production is a key feature of such tools; however, the proofs that they produce are not necessarily as concise as possible. For propositional resolution proofs, there are a wide variety of proof compression techniques. There are fewer techniques for compressing first-order resolution proofs generated by automated theorem provers. This paper describes an approach to compressing first-order logic proofs based on lifting proof compression ideas used in propositional logic to first-order logic. One method for propositional proof compression is partial regularization, which removes an inference when it is redundant in the sense that its pivot literal already occurs as the pivot of another inference in…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
