Molecular gas masses of gamma-ray burst host galaxies
Micha{\l} J. Micha{\l}owski (AMU, Pozna\'n), A. Karska, J. R. Rizzo,, M. Baes, A. J. Castro-Tirado, J. Hjorth, L. K. Hunt, P. Kamphuis, M. P., Koprowski, M. R. Krumholz, D. Malesani, A. Nicuesa Guelbenzu, J. Rasmussen,, A. Rossi, P. Schady, J. Sollerman, and P. van der Werf

TL;DR
This study investigates the molecular gas content of gamma-ray burst host galaxies, finding no significant deficiency compared to other star-forming galaxies, and suggests metallicity influences molecular gas properties.
Contribution
It provides the first comprehensive analysis combining new and existing CO observations of GRB hosts, showing their molecular gas properties are similar to typical star-forming galaxies.
Findings
Three GRB hosts are deficient in molecular gas even after metallicity correction.
The median molecular gas depletion time is slightly lower than in other galaxies, but with low statistical significance.
Molecular gas deficiency in GRB hosts is not statistically significant and is likely due to metallicity effects.
Abstract
We obtained CO(2-1) observations of seven GRB hosts with the APEX and IRAM 30m telescopes. We analysed these data together with all other hosts with previous CO observations. We obtained detections for 3 GRB hosts (980425, 080207, and 111005A) and upper limits for the remaining 4 (031203, 060505, 060814, and 100316D). In our entire sample of 12 CO-observed GRB hosts, 3 are clearly deficient in molecular gas, even taking into account their metallicity (980425, 060814, and 080517). Four others are close to the best-fit line for other star-forming galaxies on the SFR-MH2 plot (051022, 060505, 080207, and 100316D). One host is clearly molecule rich (111005A). Finally, the data for 4 GRB hosts are not deep enough to judge whether they are molecule deficient (000418, 030329, 031203, and 090423). The median value of the molecular gas depletion time, MH2/SFR, of GRB hosts is ~0.3 dex below that…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
