Experimental study of precisely selected evaporation chains in the decay of excited $^{25}$Mg
A. Camaiani, G. Casini, L. Morelli, S. Barlini, S. Piantelli, G., Baiocco, M. Bini, M. Bruno, A. Buccola, M. Cinausero, M. Cicerchia, M., D'Agostino, M. Degelier, D. Fabris, C. Frosin, F. Gramegna, F. Gulminelli, G., Mantovani, T. Marchi, A. Olmi, P. Ottanelli, G. Pasquali

TL;DR
This study investigates the de-excitation of excited $^{25}$Mg nuclei produced in $^{12}$C + $^{13}$C reactions at 95 MeV, testing statistical decay models and comparing with $^{24}$Mg decay, revealing mostly good agreement with some deviations.
Contribution
It provides new experimental data on $^{25}$Mg decay chains, testing statistical models and comparing with $^{24}$Mg decay, highlighting similarities and deviations in evaporation processes.
Findings
Decay features mostly match statistical model predictions.
Deviations observed in alpha-particle evaporation chains.
Decay behavior of $^{25}$Mg similar to $^{24}$Mg.
Abstract
The reaction C + C at 95 MeV bombarding energy is studied using the GARFIELD + Ring Counter apparatus located at the INFN Laboratori Nazionali di Legnaro. In this paper we want to investigate the de-excitation of Mg aiming both at a new stringent test of the statistical description of nuclear decay and a direct comparison with the decay of the system Mg formed through C+C reactions previously studied. Thanks to the large acceptance of the detector and to its good fragment identification capabilities, we could apply stringent selections on fusion-evaporation events, requiring their completeness in charge. The main decay features of the evaporation residues and of the emitted light particles are overall well described by a pure statistical model; however, as for the case of the previously studied 24Mg, we observed some deviations in the branching…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
