Parity Games with Weights
Sven Schewe, Alexander Weinert, Martin Zimmermann

TL;DR
This paper studies parity games with arbitrary integer weights, establishing their complexity, strategy memory requirements, and bounds on strategy quality, thus advancing understanding of quantitative infinite games.
Contribution
It extends parity games with costs to arbitrary integer weights, analyzes their complexity, and characterizes the memory and quality bounds for winning strategies.
Findings
Solving parity games with arbitrary weights is in NP ∩ coNP.
Protagonist has finite-state winning strategies with tight pseudo-polynomial bounds.
Determining strategies with quality at most b is EXPTIME-complete.
Abstract
Quantitative extensions of parity games have recently attracted significant interest. These extensions include parity games with energy and payoff conditions as well as finitary parity games and their generalization to parity games with costs. Finitary parity games enjoy a special status among these extensions, as they offer a native combination of the qualitative and quantitative aspects in infinite games: The quantitative aspect of finitary parity games is a quality measure for the qualitative aspect, as it measures the limit superior of the time it takes to answer an odd color by a larger even one. Finitary parity games have been extended to parity games with costs, where each transition is labeled with a nonnegative weight that reflects the costs incurred by taking it. We lift this restriction and consider parity games with costs with arbitrary integer weights. We show that…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
