Simple negative result for physically universal controllers with macroscopic interface

TL;DR

This paper demonstrates that physically universal controllers cannot operate solely through macroscopic control of the surrounding environment, highlighting fundamental limitations in controllability at macroscopic scales.

Contribution

It provides a simple argument showing the impossibility of macroscopic control for universal controllers, emphasizing the need for microscopic precision in control mechanisms.

Findings

Macroscopic control cannot achieve precise spatial operations.

Universal controllability requires manipulation at microscopic levels.

Control devices with only macroscopic position information are insufficient.

Abstract

To study potential limitations of controllability of physical systems I have earlier proposed physically universal cellular automata and Hamiltonians. These are translation invariant interactions for which any control operation on a finite target region can be implemented by the autonomous time evolution if the complement of the target region is 'programmed' to an appropriate initial state. This provides a model of control where the cut between a system and its controller can be consistently shifted, in analogy to the Heisenberg cut defining the boundary between a quantum system and its measurement device. However, in the known physically universal CAs the implementation of microscopic transformations requires to write the 'program' into microscopic degrees of freedom, while human actions take place on the macroscopic level. I therefore ask whether there exist physically universal interactions for which any desired operation on a target region can be performed by only controlling the macroscopic state of its surrounding. A very simple argument shows that this is impossible with respect to the notion of 'macroscopic' proposed here: control devices whose position is only specified up to 'macroscopic precision' cannot operate at a precise location in space. This suggests that reasonable notions of `universal controllability' need to be tailored to the manipulation of relative coordinates, but it is not obvious how to do this. The statement that any microscopic transformation can be implemented in principle, whenever it is true in any sense, it does not seem to be true in its most obvious sense.