Weak-Lensing Mass Calibration of ACTPol Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Clusters with the Hyper Suprime-Cam Survey
Hironao Miyatake, Nicholas Battaglia, Matt Hilton, Elinor Medezinski,, Atsushi J. Nishizawa, Surhud More, Simone Aiola, Neta Bahcall, J. Richard, Bond, Erminia Calabrese, Steve K. Choi, Mark J. Devlin, Joanna Dunkley,, Rolando Dunner, Brittany Fuzia, Patricio Gallardo

TL;DR
This paper measures galaxy cluster masses using weak lensing with Hyper Suprime-Cam data, compares different models, and finds a hydrostatic mass bias consistent with previous SZ surveys, informing cosmological studies.
Contribution
First-year Hyper Suprime-Cam weak-lensing measurements of ACTPol SZ clusters, comparing mass models and estimating hydrostatic mass bias.
Findings
Weak-lensing signal-to-noise ratio ranges from 2.2 to 8.7.
Hydrostatic mass bias ratio $1-b$ is approximately 0.74.
Systematic error from model differences is about 10%."
Abstract
We present weak-lensing measurements using the first-year data from the Hyper Suprime-Cam Strategic Survey Program on the Subaru telescope for eight galaxy clusters selected through their thermal Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (SZ) signal measured at 148 GHz with the Atacama Cosmology Telescope Polarimeter experiment. The overlap between the two surveys in this work is 33.8 square degrees, before masking bright stars. The signal-to-noise ratio of individual cluster lensing measurements ranges from 2.2 to 8.7, with a total of 11.1 for the stacked cluster weak-lensing signal. We fit for an average weak-lensing mass distribution using three different profiles, a Navarro-Frenk-White profile, a dark-matter-only emulated profile, and a full cosmological hydrodynamic emulated profile. We interpret the differences among the masses inferred by these models as a systematic error of 10\%, which is currently…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
