A Weighted Generalization of the Graham-Diaconis Inequality for Ranked List Similarity
Ali Dasdan

TL;DR
This paper extends the Graham-Diaconis inequality to weighted ranked lists, establishing a theoretical link between weighted Spearman's footrule and Kendall's tau measures.
Contribution
It introduces weighted versions of the similarity measures and proves a generalized inequality relating them, broadening the original unweighted framework.
Findings
Weighted Spearman's footrule and Kendall's tau are defined.
A generalized inequality relating the weighted measures is proven.
The results extend the theoretical understanding of ranked list similarity.
Abstract
The Graham-Diaconis inequality shows the equivalence between two well-known methods of measuring the similarity of two given ranked lists of items: Spearman's footrule and Kendall's tau. The original inequality assumes unweighted items in input lists. In this paper, we first define versions of these methods for weighted items. We then prove a generalization of the inequality for the weighted versions.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsData Management and Algorithms · Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference · Data Quality and Management
