TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that simple averaging of different pre-trained word embeddings can produce effective meta-embeddings, challenging the assumption that complex transformations are necessary for high-quality results.
Contribution
It shows that straightforward averaging of source embeddings can outperform or match complex meta-embedding methods, providing a surprisingly simple yet effective approach.
Findings
Averaging two distinct embeddings yields competitive meta-embeddings.
Simple mean-based meta-embeddings outperform some complex methods.
The approach is effective despite the incommensurability of source vector spaces.
Abstract
Creating accurate meta-embeddings from pre-trained source embeddings has received attention lately. Methods based on global and locally-linear transformation and concatenation have shown to produce accurate meta-embeddings. In this paper, we show that the arithmetic mean of two distinct word embedding sets yields a performant meta-embedding that is comparable or better than more complex meta-embedding learning methods. The result seems counter-intuitive given that vector spaces in different source embeddings are not comparable and cannot be simply averaged. We give insight into why averaging can still produce accurate meta-embedding despite the incomparability of the source vector spaces.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
