Precipitable water vapour forecasting: a tool for optimizing IR observations at Roque de los Muchachos Observatory
Gabriel P\'erez Jord\'an, Julio A. Castro Almaz\'an, Casiana Mu\~noz, Tu\~n\'on

TL;DR
This study validates the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model for accurate precipitable water vapour forecasting, demonstrating its effectiveness as an operational tool to optimize infrared astronomical observations at Roque de los Muchachos Observatory.
Contribution
The paper presents a validated, operational WRF model for PWV forecasting at ORM, with high accuracy over 24- and 48-hour horizons, improving IR observation planning.
Findings
High correlation between forecasts and GNSS data (R > 0.9).
Forecast errors are approximately 1.75-1.99 mm for 24- and 48-hour predictions.
Operational implementation of WRF enhances IR observation scheduling.
Abstract
We validate the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model for precipitable water vapour (PWV) forecasting as a fully operational tool for optimizing astronomical infrared (IR) observations at Roque de los Muchachos Observatory (ORM). For the model validation we used GNSS-based (Global Navigation Satellite System) data from the PWV monitor located at the ORM. We have run WRF every 24 h for near two months, with a horizon of 48 hours (hourly forecasts), from 2016 January 11 to 2016 March 4. These runs represent 1296 hourly forecast points. The validation is carried out using different approaches: performance as a function of the forecast range, time horizon accuracy, performance as a function of the PWV value, and performance of the operational WRF time series with 24- and 48-hour horizons. Excellent agreement was found between the model forecasts and observations, with R = 0.951 and R…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
