The Frequency of Intrinsic X-ray Weakness Among Broad Absorption Line Quasars

TL;DR

This study investigates the prevalence of intrinsically X-ray weak broad absorption line quasars using Chandra observations, identifying candidates and estimating their fraction among BAL quasars, which is higher than in non-BAL quasars.

Contribution

It provides the first constraints on the fraction of intrinsically X-ray weak BAL quasars and suggests they are more common in BAL than in non-BAL quasars.

Findings

Two quasars are identified as good candidates for intrinsically X-ray weak BAL quasars.

The fraction of intrinsically X-ray weak AGNs among HiBAL quasars is estimated at 7-10%.

The fraction among the general BAL quasar population is estimated at 6-23%.

Abstract

We present combined $\approx 14-37~\rm ks$ Chandra observations of seven $z = 1.6-2.7$ broad absorption line (BAL) quasars selected from the Large Bright Quasar Survey (LBQS). These seven objects are high-ionization BAL (HiBAL) quasars, and they were undetected in the Chandra hard band ($2-8$ keV) in previous observations. The stacking analyses of previous Chandra observations suggested that these seven objects likely contain some candidates for intrinsically X-ray weak BAL quasars. With the new Chandra observations, six targets are detected. We calculate their effective power-law photon indices and hard-band flux weakness, and find that two objects, LBQS $1203+1530$ and LBQS $1442-0011$, show soft/steep spectral shapes ($\Gamma_{\rm eff}= 2.2^{+0.9}_{-0.9}$ and $1.9_{-0.8}^{+0.9}$) and significant X-ray weakness in the hard band (by factors of $\approx$ 15 and 12). We conclude that the two HiBAL quasars are good candidates for intrinsically X-ray weak BAL quasars. The mid-infrared-to-UV spectral energy distributions (SEDs) of the two candidates are consistent with those of typical quasars. We constrain the fraction of intrinsically X-ray weak AGNs among HiBAL quasars to be $\approx 7-10\%$ ($2/29-3/29$), and we estimate it is $\approx 6- 23\%$ ($2/35-8/35$) among the general BAL quasar population. Such a fraction is considerably larger than the fraction among non-BAL quasars, and we suggest that intrinsically X-ray weak quasars are preferentially observed as BAL quasars. Intrinsically X-ray weak AGNs likely comprise a small minority of the luminous type 1 AGN population, and they should not affect significantly the completeness of these AGNs found in deep X-ray surveys.