Stable Outcomes in Modified Fractional Hedonic Games
Gianpiero Monaco, Luca Moscardelli, and Yllka Velaj

TL;DR
This paper investigates the existence, complexity, and performance of stable outcomes in modified fractional hedonic games, a class of coalition formation games with averaged benefits, highlighting differences from traditional fractional hedonic games.
Contribution
It provides a complete characterization of stable outcome existence and tight performance bounds for modified fractional hedonic games, including cases with general and 0-1 weights.
Findings
Complete characterization of stable outcome existence.
Tight bounds on stability performance.
Differences highlighted between modified and traditional fractional hedonic games.
Abstract
In coalition formation games self-organized coalitions are created as a result of the strategic interactions of independent agents. For each couple of agents , weight reflects how much agents and benefit from belonging to the same coalition. We consider the modified fractional hedonic game, that is a coalition formation game in which agents' utilities are such that the total benefit of agent belonging to a coalition (given by the sum of over all other agents belonging to the same coalition) is averaged over all the other members of that coalition, i.e., excluding herself. Modified fractional hedonic games constitute a class of succinctly representable hedonic games. We are interested in the scenario in which agents, individually or jointly, choose to form a new coalition or to join an existing one, until a stable outcome is reached.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
