Asteroseismic modelling of solar-type stars: internal systematics from input physics and surface correction methods

TL;DR

This study assesses the internal systematics affecting asteroseismic modelling of solar-type stars, focusing on input physics uncertainties and surface correction methods, revealing significant impacts on derived stellar properties.

Contribution

It provides a comprehensive analysis of how input physics and surface correction choices influence stellar property estimates in asteroseismic modelling.

Findings

Systematics from diffusion inclusion: 0.5%-16% in stellar properties.

Uncertainty in solar metallicity mixture causes up to 6.7% age systematics.

Sonoi et al. and Ball & Gizon correction methods yield lowest systematics.

Abstract

Asteroseismic forward modelling techniques are being used to determine fundamental properties (e.g. mass, radius, and age) of solar-type stars. The need to take into account all possible sources of error is of paramount importance towards a robust determination of stellar properties. We present a study of 34 solar-type stars for which high signal-to-noise asteroseismic data is available from multi-year Kepler photometry. We explore the internal systematics on the stellar properties, that is, associated with the uncertainty in the input physics used to construct the stellar models. In particular, we explore the systematics arising from: (i) the inclusion of the diffusion of helium and heavy elements; and (ii) the uncertainty in solar metallicity mixture. We also assess the systematics arising from (iii) different surface correction methods used in optimisation/fitting procedures. The systematics arising from comparing results of models with and without diffusion are found to be 0.5%, 0.8%, 2.1%, and 16% in mean density, radius, mass, and age, respectively. The internal systematics in age are significantly larger than the statistical uncertainties. We find the internal systematics resulting from the uncertainty in solar metallicity mixture to be 0.7% in mean density, 0.5% in radius, 1.4% in mass, and 6.7% in age. The surface correction method by Sonoi et al. and Ball & Gizon's two-term correction produce the lowest internal systematics among the different correction methods, namely, ~1%, ~1%, ~2%, and ~8% in mean density, radius, mass, and age, respectively. Stellar masses obtained using the surface correction methods by Kjeldsen et al. and Ball & Gizon's one-term correction are systematically higher than those obtained using frequency ratios.