Topological data analysis and diagnostics of compressible MHD turbulence
Irina Makarenko (1), Paul Bushby (1), Andrew Fletcher (1), Robin, Henderson (1), Nikolay Makarenko (2), Anvar Shukurov (1) ((1) Newcastle, University, UK, (2) Central Astronomical Observatory of RAS,, Saint-Petersburg, Russia)

TL;DR
This paper explores the use of topological data analysis techniques, such as Betti numbers and persistence diagrams, to compare and validate MHD turbulence simulations with astrophysical observations, ensuring robust quantitative analysis.
Contribution
It introduces topological data analysis methods for assessing MHD turbulence simulations and observations, demonstrating their insensitivity to data trends and resolution, and applying them to astrophysical data.
Findings
Topological measures are robust against large-scale trends.
These techniques are insensitive to data resolution.
Applied successfully to interstellar medium observations and simulations.
Abstract
The predictions of mean-field electrodynamics can now be probed using direct numerical simulations of random flows and magnetic fields. When modelling astrophysical MHD, it is important to verify that such simulations are in agreement with observations. One of the main challenges in this area is to identify robust \it{quantitative} measures to compare structures found in simulations with those inferred from astrophysical observations. A similar challenge is to compare quantitatively results from different simulations. Topological data analysis offers a range of techniques, including the Betti numbers and persistence diagrams, that can be used to facilitate such a comparison. After describing these tools, we first apply them to synthetic random fields and demonstrate that, when the data are standardized in a straightforward manner, some topological measures are insensitive to either…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
