Determination of the nuclear incompressibility from the rapidity-dependent elliptic flow in heavy-ion collisions at beam energies 0.4\emph{A} - 1.0\emph{A} GeV
Yongjia Wang, Chenchen Guo, Qingfeng Li, Arnaud Le Fevre, Yvonne, Leifels, Wolfgang Trautmann

TL;DR
This study uses rapidity-dependent elliptic flow data from heavy-ion collisions and an updated transport model to constrain the nuclear incompressibility, accounting for model uncertainties, and finds a value around 220 MeV supporting a soft equation-of-state.
Contribution
It introduces a method combining recent flow data with an updated UrQMD model to extract nuclear incompressibility while analyzing the impact of model uncertainties.
Findings
Estimated nuclear incompressibility K0 = 220 ± 40 MeV.
Rapidity-dependent elliptic flow favors a soft symmetric-matter equation-of-state.
Model uncertainties, especially in nucleon-nucleon cross sections, significantly affect the results.
Abstract
Heavy-ion-collision measurements in combination with transport model simulations serve as important tools for extracting the nuclear incompressibility. However, uncertainties in transport models (or model dependence) partly affect the reliability of the extracted result. In the present work, by using the recently measured data of rapidity-dependent flows, we constrain the incompressibility of nuclear matter and analyse the impact of model uncertainties on the obtained value. The method is based on the newly updated version of the ultrarelativistic quantum molecular dynamics (UrQMD) model in which the Skyrme potential energy-density functional is introduced. Three different Skyrme interactions which give different incompressibilities varying from =201 to 271 MeV are adopted. The incompressibility is deduced from the comparison of the UrQMD model simulations and the FOPI data for…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
