Catching Galactic open clusters in advanced stages of dynamical evolution

TL;DR

This study analyzes six Galactic open clusters at advanced dynamical stages using photometry and simulations to understand their evolution, revealing their ages, structural parameters, and signs of low-mass star depletion.

Contribution

It provides a detailed analysis of six evolved open clusters, employing MCMC simulations and CMD cleaning to determine their properties and evolutionary status, which is a novel comprehensive approach.

Findings

All clusters are tidally filled and dynamically evolved.

Clusters show signs of low-mass star depletion.

Two groups identified: approaching disruption and advanced evolution.

Abstract

During their dynamical evolution, Galactic open clusters (OCs) gradually lose their stellar content mainly because of internal relaxation and tidal forces. In this context, the study of dynamically evolved OCs is necessary to properly understand such processes. We present a comprehensive Washington $CT_1$ photometric analysis of six sparse OCs, namely: ESO 518-3, Ruprecht 121, ESO 134-12, NGC 6573, ESO 260-7 and ESO 065-7. We employed Markov chain Monte-Carlo simulations to robustly determine the central coordinates and the structural parameters and $T_1\times(C-T_1)$ colour-magnitude diagrams (CMDs) cleaned from field contamination were used to derive the fundamental parameters. ESO 518-03, Ruprecht 121, ESO 134-12 and NGC 6573 resulted to be of nearly the same young age (8.2 $\leq\textrm{log}(t \textrm{yr}^{-1})\leq$ 8.3); ESO 260-7 and ESO065-7 are of intermediate age (9.2 $\leq\textrm{log}(t \textrm{yr}^{-1})\leq$ 9.4). All studied OCs are located at similar Galactocentric distances (R$_{G}\sim6-6.9 $kpc), considering uncertainties, except for ESO 260-7 ($R_{G}=8.9 $kpc). These OCs are in a tidally filled regime and are dynamically evolved, since they are much older than their half-mass relaxation times ($t/t_{rh}\gtrsim30$) and present signals of low-mass star depletion. We distinguished two groups: those dynamically evolving towards final disruptions and those in an advanced dynamical evolutionary stage. Although we do not rule out that the Milky Way potential could have made differentially faster their dynamical evolutions, we speculate here with the possibility that they have been mainly driven by initial formation conditions.