
TL;DR
This paper investigates a stronger version of the Corners Theorem in abelian groups, demonstrating that the expected uniform distribution of corners does not always hold, but in certain groups like _2^n, a larger density of corners can be guaranteed.
Contribution
The paper introduces a negative result for the stronger corner distribution conjecture and provides bounds for specific groups, linking the problem to a simpler probabilistic model.
Findings
Counterexamples with low corner counts for all non-zero differences
In _2^n, existence of a difference with high corner density
Relation of the problem to a simpler random variable problem
Abstract
The Corners Theorem states that for any there exists an such that for any abelian group with and any subset with we can find a corner in , i.e. there exist with such that . Here, we consider a stronger version: given such a group and subset , for each we define . So is the number of corners of size . Is it true that, provided is sufficiently large, there must exist some such that ? We answer this question in the negative. We do this by relating the problem to a much simpler-looking problem about random variables. Then, using this link, we show that there are sets with…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
