A synopsis of comparative metrics for classifications
Bernardo Lopo Tavares

TL;DR
This paper provides a comprehensive overview and formal analysis of various metrics used to compare phylogenetic trees, discussing their features, computational efficiency, and challenges for future research.
Contribution
It systematically formalizes and compares multiple phylogenetic tree metrics, including original insights on their discriminative power and computational complexity.
Findings
Analyzed key phylogenetic tree metrics in detail.
Discussed computational complexities and limitations.
Identified challenges for future metric development.
Abstract
Phylogeny is the study of the relations between biological entities. From it, the need to compare tree-like graphs has risen and several metrics were established and researched, but since there is no definitive way to compare them, its discussion is still open nowadays. All of them emphasize different features of the structures and, of course, the efficiency of these computations also varies. The work in this article is mainly expositive (a lifting from a collection of papers and articles) with special care in its presentation (trying to mathematically formalize what was not presented that way previously) and filling (with original work) where information was not available (or at least, to our knowledge) given the frame we set to fit these metrics, which was to state their discriminative power and time complexity. The Robinson Foulds, Robinson Foulds Length, Quartet, Triplet, Triplet…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGenome Rearrangement Algorithms · Algorithms and Data Compression
