Optimizing spectroscopic follow-up strategies for supernova photometric classification with active learning
E. E. O. Ishida, R. Beck, S. Gonzalez-Gaitan, R. S. de Souza, A., Krone-Martins, J. W. Barrett, N. Kennamer, R. Vilalta, J. M. Burgess, B., Quint, A. Z. Vitorelli, A. Mahabal, E. Gangler (for the COIN collaboration)

TL;DR
This paper introduces an active learning framework for optimizing spectroscopic follow-up in supernova classification, significantly reducing observational costs while maintaining high classification purity.
Contribution
It presents a novel active learning approach that efficiently selects spectroscopic targets, even without initial training data, and accounts for multiple observations per night.
Findings
Double purity with only 12% of SNPCC spectroscopic sample
Achieves 2.3 times higher purity after 180 days
Uses same spectroscopic resources as traditional methods
Abstract
We report a framework for spectroscopic follow-up design for optimizing supernova photometric classification. The strategy accounts for the unavoidable mismatch between spectroscopic and photometric samples, and can be used even in the beginning of a new survey -- without any initial training set. The framework falls under the umbrella of active learning (AL), a class of algorithms that aims to minimize labelling costs by identifying a few, carefully chosen, objects which have high potential in improving the classifier predictions. As a proof of concept, we use the simulated data released after the Supernova Photometric Classification Challenge (SNPCC) and a random forest classifier. Our results show that, using only 12\% the number of training objects in the SNPCC spectroscopic sample, this approach is able to double purity results. Moreover, in order to take into account multiple…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
