Open or Closed? Information Flow Decided by Transfer Operators and Forecastability Quality Metric
Erik M. Bollt

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new theoretical framework for analyzing information flow and causality in systems using transfer operators and a novel Forecastability Quality Metric based on Jensen-Shannon divergence, with applications to chaotic systems.
Contribution
It develops an analytic approach to system closure and information flow using Frobenius-Perron transfer operators, introducing the Forecastability Quality Metric (FQM) based on Jensen-Shannon divergence.
Findings
FQM effectively distinguishes open and closed system influences.
Theoretical analysis clarifies the role of transfer operators in causality.
Illustration with a coupled chaotic system demonstrates the approach.
Abstract
A basic systems question concerns the concept of closure, meaning autonomomy (closed) in the sense of describing the (sub)system as fully consistent within itself. Alternatively, the system may be nonautonomous (open) meaning it receives influence from an outside coupling subsystem. Information flow, and related causation inference, are tenant on this simple concept. We take the perspective of Weiner-Granger causality, descriptive of a subsystem forecast quality dependence on considering states of another subsystem. Here we develop a new direct analytic discussion, rather than a data oriented approach. That is, we refer to the underlying Frobenius-Perron transfer operator that moderates evolution of densities of ensembles of orbits, and two alternative forms of the restricted Frobenius-Perron (FP) operator, interpreted as if either closed (determinstic FP) or not closed (the unaccounted…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
