Counterexamples for Cohen-Macaulayness of Lattice Ideals
Laura Felicia Matusevich, Aleksandra Sobieska

TL;DR
This paper constructs infinitely many examples of lattice ideals and their associated toric ideals in various codimensions, demonstrating cases where one is Cohen-Macaulay and the other is not, highlighting nuanced differences in their algebraic properties.
Contribution
It introduces a method to generate infinite pairs of lattice and toric ideals with contrasting Cohen-Macaulay properties across all codimensions.
Findings
Infinite examples of lattice and toric ideal pairs with differing Cohen-Macaulayness
Demonstrates the nuanced relationship between lattice ideals and their saturation
Highlights the complexity of Cohen-Macaulay property in lattice-based ideals
Abstract
Let be a lattice, its corresponding lattice ideal, and the toric ideal arising from the saturation of . We produce infinitely many examples, in every codimension, of pairs where one of these ideals is Cohen--Macaulay but the other is not.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
