TL;DR
This study evaluates how data quality impacts the effectiveness of hierarchical multi-stock assessment models in fisheries, demonstrating their advantages over single-stock models especially with limited data, through simulations and real data application.
Contribution
It introduces a comprehensive evaluation of hierarchical multi-stock models' performance with varying data quality, highlighting their potential benefits and limitations in data-limited fisheries assessment.
Findings
Multi-stock models often outperform single-stock models with low statistical power data.
Hierarchical priors for survey catchability improve model performance in data-poor scenarios.
Testing in simulations is recommended before applying to real fisheries management.
Abstract
An emerging approach to data-limited fisheries stock assessment uses hierarchical multi-stock assessment models to group stocks together, sharing information from data-rich to data-poor stocks. In this paper, we simulate data-rich and data-poor fishery and survey data scenarios for a complex of dover sole stocks. Simulated data for individual stocks were used to compare estimation performance for single-stock and hierarchical multi-stock versions of a Schaefer production model. The single-stock and best performing multi-stock models were then used in stock assessments for the real dover sole data. Multi-stock models often had lower estimation errors than single-stock models when assessment data had low statistical power. Relative errors for productivity and relative biomass parameters were lower for multi-stock assessment model configurations. In addition, multi-stock models that…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
