Invariant measures of disagreement with stochastic dominance
E. del Barrio, J.A. Cuesta-Albertos, C. Matran

TL;DR
This paper explores invariant measures of disagreement based on stochastic dominance, introducing indices that quantify the degree of dominance and analyzing their properties through examples, applications, and theoretical insights.
Contribution
It introduces and discusses new indices for measuring disagreement under stochastic dominance that are invariant under increasing transformations and explores their theoretical and practical implications.
Findings
Indices can measure the degree of stochastic dominance disagreement.
Some indices reveal the maximum difference in distributional status.
Applications demonstrate practical advantages and limitations.
Abstract
Stochastic dominance has not been too employed in practice due to its important limitations. To increase its versatility, the concept has recently been adapted by introducing various indices that measure the degree to which one probability distribution stochastically dominates another. In this paper, starting from the fundamentals and using very simple examples, we present and discuss some of these indices when one intends to maintain invariance through increasing functions. This naturally leads to consideration of the appealing common representation, , where is a random vector with marginal distributions and . The indices considered here arise from different dependencies between X and Y. This includes the case of independent marginals, as well as other indices related to a contamination model or to a joint quantile representation. We emphasize the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRandom Matrices and Applications · Statistical Methods and Inference · Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
