Random Order Contention Resolution Schemes
Marek Adamczyk, Micha{\l} W{\l}odarczyk

TL;DR
This paper develops new contention resolution schemes for intersection of matroids and knapsacks in the random order setting, using martingale techniques, leading to improved approximation ratios in mechanism design and stochastic optimization.
Contribution
It introduces a unified martingale-based analysis for contention resolution schemes in the random order setting, extending their applicability and improving approximation bounds.
Findings
Achieves a $k+4+ ext{epsilon}$ approximation for Bayesian multi-parameter unit-demand mechanism design.
Provides improved approximation ratios for stochastic $k$-set packing.
Extends stochastic probing results to non-monotone submodular objectives.
Abstract
Contention resolution schemes have proven to be an incredibly powerful concept which allows to tackle a broad class of problems. The framework has been initially designed to handle submodular optimization under various types of constraints, that is, intersections of exchange systems (including matroids), knapsacks, and unsplittable flows on trees. Later on, it turned out that this framework perfectly extends to optimization under uncertainty, like stochastic probing and online selection problems, which further can be applied to mechanism design. We add to this line of work by showing how to create contention resolution schemes for intersection of matroids and knapsacks when we work in the random order setting. More precisely, we do know the whole universe of elements in advance, but they appear in an order given by a random permutation. Upon arrival we need to irrevocably decide…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
