Human Robot Interface for Assistive Grasping
David Watkins, Chaiwen Chou, Caroline Weinberg, Jacob Varley, Kenneth, Lyons, Sanjay Joshi, Lynne Weber, Joel Stein, Peter Allen

TL;DR
This paper presents a human-in-the-loop assistive grasping system that evaluates various input devices, including novel sEMG sensors, to improve control for individuals with disabilities, and establishes a benchmark for device effectiveness.
Contribution
It introduces a generalized benchmark for assessing input devices in assistive grasping systems and explores the potential of sEMG control for severely disabled users.
Findings
Different input devices vary in effectiveness for assistive grasping.
sEMG control shows promise for severely disabled individuals.
Benchmarking approach aids in evaluating assistive interfaces.
Abstract
This work describes a new human-in-the-loop (HitL) assistive grasping system for individuals with varying levels of physical capabilities. We investigated the feasibility of using four potential input devices with our assistive grasping system interface, using able-bodied individuals to define a set of quantitative metrics that could be used to assess an assistive grasping system. We then took these measurements and created a generalized benchmark for evaluating the effectiveness of any arbitrary input device into a HitL grasping system. The four input devices were a mouse, a speech recognition device, an assistive switch, and a novel sEMG device developed by our group that was connected either to the forearm or behind the ear of the subject. These preliminary results provide insight into how different interface devices perform for generalized assistive grasping tasks and also highlight…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAssistive Technology in Communication and Mobility · Muscle activation and electromyography studies · EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
