TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that evolving the geometry, control systems, and material development of soft robots in response to interoceptive stimuli enhances their robustness to material defects, surpassing traditional static designs.
Contribution
It introduces a method for improving robot robustness by co-evolving morphology, control, and material development driven by interoceptive signals during lifetime.
Findings
Robots developed with environment-mediated morphology are more defect-tolerant.
Developmental adaptation to interoceptive stimuli improves robustness.
Evolving multiple system aspects enhances resilience to damage.
Abstract
Typically, AI researchers and roboticists try to realize intelligent behavior in machines by tuning parameters of a predefined structure (body plan and/or neural network architecture) using evolutionary or learning algorithms. Another but not unrelated longstanding property of these systems is their brittleness to slight aberrations, as highlighted by the growing deep learning literature on adversarial examples. Here we show robustness can be achieved by evolving the geometry of soft robots, their control systems, and how their material properties develop in response to one particular interoceptive stimulus (engineering stress) during their lifetimes. By doing so we realized robots that were equally fit but more robust to extreme material defects (such as might occur during fabrication or by damage thereafter) than robots that did not develop during their lifetimes, or developed in…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
