Matter imprints in waveform models for neutron star binaries: tidal and self-spin effects

TL;DR

This paper evaluates and improves waveform models for neutron star binaries by incorporating tidal and self-spin effects, crucial for accurate gravitational wave data analysis in multi-messenger astronomy.

Contribution

It introduces a combined approach using NRTidal with existing black hole waveform models to better represent neutron star binary signals.

Findings

Minimal mismatches achieved with combined PN self-spin and NRTidal effects

NRTidal tends to overestimate tidal interactions during inspiral

Waveform models improve parameter estimation accuracy

Abstract

The combined observation of gravitational and electromagnetic waves from the coalescence of two neutron stars marks the beginning of multi-messenger astronomy with gravitational waves (GWs). The development of accurate gravitational waveform models is a crucial prerequisite to extract information about the properties of the binary system that generated a detected GW signal. In binary neutron star systems (BNS), tidal effects also need to be incorporated in the modeling for an accurate waveform representation. Building on previous work [Phys.Rev.D96 121501], we explore the performance of inspiral-merger waveform models that are obtained by adding a numerical relativity (NR) based approximant for the tidal part of the phasing (NRTidal) to existing models for nonprecessing and precessing binary black hole systems (SEOBNRv4, PhenomD and PhenomPv2), as implemented in the LSC Algorithm Library Suite. The resulting BNS waveforms are compared and contrasted to target waveforms hybridizing NR waveforms, covering the last approx. 10 orbits up to merger and extending through the postmerger phase, with inspiral waveforms calculated from 30Hz obtained with TEOBResumS. The latter is a state-of-the-art effective-one-body waveform model that blends together tidal and spin effects. We probe that the combination of the PN-based self-spin terms and of the NRTidal description is necessary to obtain minimal mismatches (< 0.01) and phase differences (< 1 rad) with respect to the target waveforms. However, we also discuss possible improvements and drawbacks of the NRTidal approximant in its current form, since we find that it tends to overestimate the tidal interaction with respect to the TEOBResumS model during the inspiral.