Gamma-ray burst jet breaks revisited
Xiang-Gao Wang (GXU), Bing Zhang (UNLV), En-Wei Liang (GXU), Rui-Jing, Lu (GXU), Jing Li (GXU), Long Li (GXU)

TL;DR
This study revisits gamma-ray burst jet breaks using a large sample, confirming many theoretical predictions, refining empirical correlations, and highlighting the diversity and complexity of GRB energetics and jet structures.
Contribution
The paper provides a comprehensive analysis of optical and X-ray jet breaks in 99 GRBs, testing theoretical models and empirical relations with a large, updated dataset.
Findings
55 GRBs show behaviors consistent with jet break models
Typical beaming correction factor is around 1000 for Type II GRBs
Most empirical correlations are less tight than previously thought
Abstract
Gamma-ray Burst (GRB) collimation has been inferred with the observations of achromatic steepening in GRB light curves, known as jet breaks. Identifying a jet break from a GRB afterglow lightcurve allows a measurement of the jet opening angle and true energetics of GRBs. In this paper, we reinvestigate this problem using a large sample of GRBs that have an optical jet break which is consistent with being achromatic in the X-ray band. Our sample includes 99 GRBs from February 1997 to March 2015 that have optical and, for Swift GRBs, X-ray lightcurves that are consistent with the jet break interpretation. Out of 99 GRBs we have studied, 55 GRBs are found to have temporal and spectral behaviors both before and after the break consistent with the theoretical predictions of the jet break models, respectively. These include 53 long/soft (Type II) and 2 short/hard (Type I) GRBs. Only 1 GRB is…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
