TL;DR
This paper introduces R packages 'live' and 'breakDown' for explaining complex model predictions, compares them with existing methods like lime and ShapleyR, and enhances interpretability of black box models.
Contribution
The paper presents two new R packages for model explanation, offering novel approaches and benchmarking them against existing state-of-the-art solutions.
Findings
live and breakDown provide effective attribution of predictions to input features
Comparison shows strengths and limitations relative to lime and ShapleyR
Enhances interpretability of complex models in R environment
Abstract
Complex models are commonly used in predictive modeling. In this paper we present R packages that can be used to explain predictions from complex black box models and attribute parts of these predictions to input features. We introduce two new approaches and corresponding packages for such attribution, namely live and breakDown. We also compare their results with existing implementations of state of the art solutions, namely lime that implements Locally Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations and ShapleyR that implements Shapley values.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
MethodsLocal Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations
