Subsystem Complexity and Holography
Cesar A. Ag\'on, Matthew Headrick, and Brian Swingle

TL;DR
This paper investigates holographic circuit complexity for spatial regions, comparing holographic proposals with tensor network models, and finds a qualitative match with the holographic action but not with volume for mixed states.
Contribution
It introduces and compares several holographic analogues of circuit complexity for mixed states, highlighting a promising match with the holographic action conjecture.
Findings
Holographic action complexity matches purification complexity for mixed states.
Holographic volume does not match any of the proposed mixed-state complexities.
Tensor network intuition supports the holographic action complexity results.
Abstract
We study circuit complexity for spatial regions in holographic field theories. We study analogues based on the entanglement wedge of the bulk quantities appearing in the "complexity = volume" and "complexity = action" conjectures. We calculate these quantities for one exterior region of an eternal static neutral or charged black hole in general dimensions, dual to a thermal state on one boundary with or without chemical potential respectively, as well as for a shock wave geometry. We then define several analogues of circuit complexity for mixed states, and use tensor networks to gain intuition about them. We find a promising qualitative match between the holographic action and what we call the purification complexity, the minimum number of gates required to prepare an arbitrary purification of the given mixed state. On the other hand, the holographic volume does not appear to match any…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
