Invariants in Noncommutative Dynamics
Alexandru Chirvasitu, Benjamin Passer

TL;DR
This paper investigates the limitations of invariants in noncommutative dynamics, particularly in resolving noncommutative Borsuk-Ulam conjectures, revealing cases where invariants fail to distinguish certain free coactions.
Contribution
It demonstrates that for some finite-dimensional quantum groups, no invariant can universally solve the Type 1 conjecture, contrasting with the abelian case, and explores invariants' behavior under deformation.
Findings
No well-behaved invariant solves the Type 1 conjecture for certain finite-dimensional H.
All iterated joins of H can be cleft as comodules over the associated Hopf algebra.
Invariants like local-triviality dimension and spectral count can change under $ heta$-deformation.
Abstract
When a compact quantum group coacts freely on unital -algebras and , the existence of equivariant maps may often be ruled out due to the incompatibility of some invariant. We examine the limitations of using invariants, both concretely and abstractly, to resolve the noncommutative Borsuk-Ulam conjectures of Baum-Dabrowski-Hajac. Among our results, we find that for certain finite-dimensional , there can be no well-behaved invariant which solves the Type 1 conjecture for all free coactions of . This claim is in stark contrast to the case when is finite-dimensional and abelian. In the same vein, it is possible for all iterated joins of to be cleft as comodules over the Hopf algebra associated to . Finally, two commonly used invariants, the local-triviality dimension and the spectral count, may both change in a -deformation procedure.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
