R2RML Mappings in OBDA Systems: Enabling Comparison among OBDA Tools

TL;DR

This paper compares two OBDA systems, Mastro and Ontop, focusing on their support for R2RML mappings and evaluating their performance using standard benchmarks to facilitate system comparison.

Contribution

It integrates R2RML support into Mastro and provides a comparative analysis of OBDA tools using W3C standard mappings and benchmark specifications.

Findings

Mastro now supports R2RML mappings.

Comparison results highlight differences in system performance.

Enabling standard mappings improves interoperability.

Abstract

In today's large enterprises there is a significant increasing trend in the amount of data that has to be stored and processed. To complicate this scenario the complexity of organizing and managing a large collection of data, structured according to a single, unified schema, makes so that there is almost never a single place where to look to satisfy an information need. The Ontology-Based Data Access (OBDA) paradigm aims at mitigating this phenomenon by providing to the users of the system a unified and shared conceptual view of the domain of interest (ontology), while still enabling the data to be stored in different data sources, which are managed by a relational database. In an OBDA system the link between the data stored at the sources and the ontology is provided through a declarative specification given in terms of a set of mappings. In this work we focus on comparing two of the available systems for OBDA, namely, Mastro and Ontop, by adopting OBDA specifications based on W3C recommendations. We first show how support for R2RML mappings has been integrated in Mastro, which was the last feature missing in order to enable the system to use specifications based solely on W3C recommendations relevant to OBDA. We then proceed in performing a comparison between these systems over two OBDA specifications, the NPD Benchmark and the ACI specification.