The Impact of Feedback in Massive Star Formation. II. Lower Star Formation Efficiency at Lower Metallicity
Kei E. I. Tanaka, Jonathan C. Tan, Yichen Zhang, Takashi Hosokawa

TL;DR
This study models massive star formation across various metallicities, revealing feedback processes and their influence on star formation efficiency, especially highlighting the rarity of massive stars in extremely metal-poor environments.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive theoretical analysis of feedback mechanisms affecting star formation efficiency at different metallicities, emphasizing the roles of outflows and photoevaporation.
Findings
Magneto-centrifugal outflows dominate feedback at solar metallicity.
Radiation pressure has minor impact even for stars over 100 solar masses.
Massive stars are less common in environments with metallicity below 1e-3Zsun.
Abstract
We conduct a theoretical study of the formation of massive stars over a wide range of metallicities from 1e-5 to 1Zsun and evaluate the star formation efficiencies (SFEs) from prestellar cloud cores taking into account multiple feedback processes. Unlike for simple spherical accretion, in the case of disk accretion feedback processes do not set upper limits on stellar masses. At solar metallicity, launching of magneto-centrifugally-driven outflows is the dominant feedback process to set SFEs, while radiation pressure, which has been regarded to be pivotal, has only minor contribution even in the formation of over-100Msun stars. Photoevaporation becomes significant in over-20Msun star formation at low metallicities of <1e-2Zsun, where dust absorption of ionizing photons is inefficient. We conclude that if initial prestellar core properties are similar, then massive stars are rarer in…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
