
TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that unlike the Aluthge transform, the Duggal transform does not necessarily preserve the complex symmetric property of operators, correcting a previous misconception.
Contribution
It provides a counterexample showing the Duggal transform does not always inherit complex symmetry, clarifying a previously claimed property.
Findings
Duggal transform isn't always complex symmetric when the original operator is.
The paper corrects a misconception in prior literature.
Provides explicit examples illustrating the failure of property inheritance.
Abstract
It is known that if an operator is complex symmetric then its Aluthge transform is also complex symmetric. This Note is devoted to showing that the Duggal transform doesn't inherit this property. For instance, we'll show that the Duggal transform isn't always complex symmetric when is, as it was claimed in \cite{Ga}.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
